- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:22:11 -0500
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, wai-xtech@w3.org, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, public html for all <list@html4all.org>
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 09:23 +0100, Steven Faulkner wrote: > Gregory, can you add this issue to the issue tracker. thanks. > > issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft). Are you sure you want this issue to be separate from issue 31? ISSUE-31 missing-alt Should img without alt ever be conforming http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/31 It's straightforward to change the short description of an issue. [...] > There has been no response from the HTML WG to the PF WG in regards to this. Right; the PF WG request is still pending... > It is requested that this issue remain open until: > Consensus has been reached by the HTML WG on normative/informative > statements within the HTML 5 spec regarding the alt and its uses or if > consensus cannot be reached, the issue is brought to a formal vote. We don't current have technical support for the distinction between "editor is done considering input so far" and "test cases are done and the wg has decided the issue". I need to think some more about how to handle cases where "editor is done considering input so far" and the outcome should be reviewed by more than just the HTML WG. > [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2007Oct/0044.html > [2]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Feb/0082.html > [3] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/54 > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 15:22:37 UTC