- From: Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:43:11 +0200
- To: "Diego La Monica (IWA/HWG)" <d.lamonica@webprofession.com>
- Cc: diego.lamonica@gmail.com, wai-xtech@w3.org
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 19:45:24 UTC
Diego, There is on;ly 1 definition here. The formatting shows these 3 lines all under "Three state checkbox". Thus, there is an internal conflict in the definition. - Aaron "Diego La Monica (IWA/HWG)" <d.lamonica@webprofession.com> Sent by: diego.lamonica@gmail.com 04/11/2008 09:29 PM To Aaron M Leventhal/Cambridge/IBM@IBMUS cc wai-xtech@w3.org Subject Re: Style guide: tristatecheckbox I suppose that we should consider it as 2 different code paths for space behavior when we use a trsitate check box and a dual state check box. I don't see any kind of conflict. Cheers --- Diego La Monica (IWA/HWG) On 11/04/2008, Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com> wrote: The below definition conflicts with itself. If the item is partially checked, space rotates through checked, unchecked and then partially checked again. However, the first bullet says if it's not checked that space checks it! Is the implementation supposed to have 2 different code paths for unchecked checkboxes depending on whether it was originally partially checked? - Aaron Three State Check Box If not checked, space checks the check box If checked, space unchecks the check box If partially checked, space will rotate through checked, unchecked, and partially checked states.
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 19:45:24 UTC