- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:40:05 +0200
- To: HTML4All <list@html4all.org>
- Cc: 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, wai-xtech@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
John Foliot wrote: > However, if the next generation authoring language *DID NOT ALLOW > THIS*, then Flickr and kin would wake up and smell the coffee, and > allow the contributors the ability to do the right thing. Keep in mind that the *current* generation authoring language does not allow alt to be omitted. A simple requirement for alt in HTML5, just like in HTML4, won't have any effect on sites like flickr. But there is sure to be other, more effective approaches that might. > It is for this *VERY* reason that the next-gen language needs to be more > pro-active in the social engineering regard, to force (through the risk of > non-conformance) authoring tools to provide the ability for content authors > to do the right thing - something I cannot do at Flickr even if I wanted to. HTML5 conformance criteria should not be considered to be a social engineering tool. The lack of requirement for alt in a few cases does not prevent alt text inspection tools being integrated into accessibility checkers or validators. Social engineering on this issue can and should continue through other avenues, such as accessibility guidelines, advocacy and education; but not in the HTML5 specification. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 09:40:54 UTC