Tuesday, 1 April 1997
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
Monday, 31 March 1997
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction]
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction]
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: AW: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- AW: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- AW: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- AW: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- XML-LINK questions
- PIs
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction]
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution [market distinction]
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- XML FAQ
Sunday, 30 March 1997
- draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
Saturday, 29 March 1997
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
Friday, 28 March 1997
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- WebWeek story
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
Thursday, 27 March 1997
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: Apologies to Lee
- The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Apologies to Lee
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- Re: XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- XML Conformance Levels [Was: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
Wednesday, 26 March 1997
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: FYI (Transliteration)
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th
- ERB Decisions of March 26th
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- XML & Math
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- &, %, Literals, QuotedCData
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- RE: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls
- Re: Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls
- Re: HTML/XML: the schism?
Tuesday, 25 March 1997
Wednesday, 26 March 1997
Tuesday, 25 March 1997
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls
- Name groups in ELEMENT and ATTLIST Decls
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- WG meeting at WWW6
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: ERB call on addressing
Monday, 24 March 1997
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- real-world XML link exercise
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML
- Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML
- Re: FPI resolution
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- Transparent content negotiation pointers & status
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- Re: How to put XML on the Web
- How to put XML on the Web
- ERB call on addressing
Sunday, 23 March 1997
Saturday, 22 March 1997
- Re: Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html
- Re: Character references in XML
- Re: Character references in XML
- Character references in XML
- Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML
- HTML/XML: the schism?
Friday, 21 March 1997
- Uncertainties in implementing WD-xml.html
- Re: HTML/XML, le schisme?
- Re: HTML/XML, le schisme?
- Re: HTML/XML, le schisme?
- Re: HTML/XML, le schisme?
- HTML/XML, le schisme?
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question (2 cc's deleted)
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Start comment with <!--* or <--*
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft
- Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft
- Two more points for cleanup in existing draft
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
Thursday, 20 March 1997
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- XML FAQ
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
Wednesday, 19 March 1997
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: the return of the Public Identifier Question
- the return of the Public Identifier Question
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: FPI resolution
- Re: FPI resolution
- Re: FPI resolution
Tuesday, 18 March 1997
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs]
- Techweb article
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs]
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs]
- TechWeb article about XML
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs]
- Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum [URLs]
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing
- Re: XML interchange
- Japanese translation of the XML draft
Monday, 17 March 1997
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: Terminology in XML-Link Draft
- SGML Forum of NY: 13 March
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: XML marketing contributions
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- ERB reporting group
- Terminology in XML-Link Draft
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing
- RE: another vote for spans
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Re: ERB: decision and conundrum
- Archives updated; roster changed
- Japanese XML page
Sunday, 16 March 1997
Monday, 17 March 1997
Sunday, 16 March 1997
Saturday, 15 March 1997
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- RE: another vote for spans
- Re: Conference in San Diego
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Conditional sections
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
Friday, 14 March 1997
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML
- Re: Re Stylesheet association
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: Re Stylesheet association
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: Recent ERB Work on URL addressing
- Re: Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Re: Re Stylesheet association
- Re: Re Stylesheet association
- XML article in EC.COM
- Re Stylesheet association
- FYI: URN status
- Conference in San Diego
- Recent ERB work - miscellaneous
- Recent ERB Work on URL addressing
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Re: Microsoft bases two proposals on XML
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Microsoft bases two proposals on XML
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
Thursday, 13 March 1997
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: XML interchange
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: XML interchange
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: those predeclared entity refs
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Incorrect Reply to Lee ["Associating"]
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Re: Stylesheet association
Wednesday, 12 March 1997
- Re: XML interchange [was Re: Stylesheet association]
- those predeclared entity refs
- Re: XML interchange
- Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source
- XML interchange [was Re: Stylesheet association]
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Re: Stylesheet association
- Stylesheet association
- Re: XML Press Release
Tuesday, 11 March 1997
- Re: XML Press Release
- Re: XML Press Release
- Re: XML Press Release
- Re: XML Press Release
- XML Press Release
- Re: Spans, and an RFI
- Spans, and an RFI
- Re: another vote for spans
- Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators?
- RE: another vote for spans
Monday, 10 March 1997
- 5 March XML-link comments
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address
- Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals?
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: clarification re. tokens
- Entity resolution
- Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators?
- Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators?
- clarification re. tokens
- another vote for spans
- Addressing spans
- Attribute value normalization incompatibility
- Re: Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG)
Sunday, 9 March 1997
- Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!)
- Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source
- Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source
Saturday, 8 March 1997
- Re: Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG)
- Re: Link draft: 5.2 location source
- Re: Link draft: 5.5 TEI location reference type
- Link draft: 3.2 extended link
- Re: Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG)
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Upcoming Journal Publishers XML Tutorial and Math Round Table (EPSIG)
Friday, 7 March 1997
- Re: 4.4 URL processing
- Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators?
- WG get-together in San Diego
- Re: 4.4 URL processing
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (hum, hum!)
- Re: 7. Attribute remapping?
- Re: 7. Attribute remapping?
- Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals?
- Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: 4.6 Query Language Locators?
- Re: 4.3 SGML addressing
- Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address
- Re: 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)?
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!)
- Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!)
Thursday, 6 March 1997
- Re: XML marketing conference, San Diego
- Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!)
- XML marketing conference, San Diego
- Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!)
- RE: Bogus XML conformance claim
- RE: Bogus XML conformance claim
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!)
- Last word on LINKTYPE (ha, ha!)
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Bogus XML conformance claim
- Re: Kind of surprising commercial XML application (long)
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: Kind of surprising commercial XML application (long)
- Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address
- Re: 4.1 Address types
- Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
Wednesday, 5 March 1997
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: 4.b Links pointing at links?
- Re: 4.4 URL processing
- Re: 4.3 SGML addressing
- Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups
- Re: 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)?
- Re: 4.b Links pointing at links?
- Re: 4.6 Query Language Locators?
- Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals?
- Re: 7. Attribute remapping?
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: 4.a Can resources be plural?
- Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address
- Re: 4.1 Address types
- Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators?
- Re: 4.4 URL processing
- Re: 4.1 Address types
- Re: 4.b Links pointing at links?
- Re: 4.3 SGML addressing
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 4.b Links pointing at links?
- Updated/reorganized spec
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: Kind of surprising commercial XML application
- Re: 4.b Links pointing at links?
- Re: 4.a Can resources be plural?
- Re: 4.6 Query Language Locators?
- Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals?
- Re: 4.3 SGML addressing
- Re: 4.1 Address types
- Re: 4.2 Location-source/Base address
- Re: 7. Attribute remapping?
- Re: 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators?
- Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Kind of surprising commercial XML application
- Re: 7. Attribute remapping?
- Re: 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)?
- Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 5.1 Extended Link Groups
- Re: 5.2 Linking element corrals?
- Re: 4.1 Address types
Tuesday, 4 March 1997
- Re: 4.3 SGML addressing
- Re: 7. Attribute remapping?
- Re: 4.a Can resources be plural?
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 7. Attribute remapping?
- Re: 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: 4.a Can resources be plural?
- 5.2 Linking element corrals?
- 7. Attribute remapping?
- 4.5 TEI Extended Pointer Locators?
- 5.1 Extended Link Groups
- 4.6 Query Language Locators?
- 4.b Links pointing at links?
- 4.4 URL processing
- 4.3 SGML addressing
- 4.2 Location-source/Base address
- 4.d Compulsory locator language(s)?
- 4.1 Address types
- 4.a Can resources be plural?
- 4.c Homegrown locator language?
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Lotsa discussion items coming atcha
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: LABEL attributes
- Re: ERB work on 3.* (Linking Elements) issues
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: LABEL attributes
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: XML encoding names
- Re: XML encoding names
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- XML in Infoworld
- XML encoding names
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
Monday, 3 March 1997
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: XML at www.w3.org
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- XML at www.w3.org
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Call for WWW6 demos
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
Sunday, 2 March 1997
Monday, 3 March 1997
Sunday, 2 March 1997
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: ERB work on 3.* (Linking Elements)
- Couldn't XML allow and ignore omitted tag minimization
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal
- Re: 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- Re: 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links
- ERB work on 3.* (Linking Elements) issues
- 3.4 New Item: unify simple and extended links
- 3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements?
- 3.2.a Name for generalized multilink
- 3.1 b-h: BEHAVIOR
- 3.1 b-h: LABEL attributes
- 3.1 b-h: ROLE & LOCATOR attributes
- 3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data?
- 3.a List link required?
- Re: ERB decisions on the LINKTYPE proposal