- From: Murray Altheim <Murray.Altheim@Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 17:24:41 -0800 (PST)
- To: Dave Hollander <dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
"Dave Hollander" <dmh@hpsgml.fc.hp.com> writes: > > At 12:33 PM 3/4/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: [...] > >4.2.c Should we formalize the concept of the implied location source? > > Is this the same as: resource name used to reach this resource ? > If so, we do need the concept to express priority policy re expressed > location source. Note that in the case of resources delivery based on client type (eg., 24bit GIF vs. 1 bit GIF) the implied location will depend on who is asking for the resource. We may have to allow for binding client-type information to the request. Murray ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Murray Altheim, SGML Toolhead <altheim@eng.sun.com> Tools Development & Online Production Sun Microsystems, Inc. Menlo Park, California
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 1997 20:28:17 UTC