- From: altheim <Murray.Altheim@Eng.Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 17:01:18 -0800 (PST)
- To: paul@arbortext.com
- Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Paul writes: [discussion of preference order for PUBLIC vs. SYSTEM in catalogs...] > Yes, one can add something like the OVERRIDE entry to the catalog. > This is one way to implement my choice (g) which says to require > that there is some way for the user to specify which to try first > (so that the user can specific that PUBLIC should be tried first). > > But I'm not going to be the one to suggest we complicate the XML catalog. Nor I. I was under the impression that after the previous extended discussion of this issue, it was determined that because of the variant processing needs of differing applications, it should be left up to the application designer to determine preference order and error handling. In this recent reintroduction of the topic I see no new information that would lead me to believe any change to this would be warranted. It seems well beyond the scope of an XML specification to determine *for the application designer* the best method for handling resource requests and their failure. There are simply too many possible uses of XML to believe that one behaviour could suit all needs. We should opt not to be overly restrictive here unless we want to create a whole subclass of pseudo-conforming XML applications that do what the designer needs, but use a variant catalog behaviour. Murray ........................................................................... Murray Altheim, SGML Grease Monkey <altheim@eng.sun.com> Tools Development & Online Production Sun Microsystems, 2550 Garcia Ave., MS UMPK17-102, Menlo Park, CA 94043 USA "Give a monkey the tools and he'll build a typewriter."
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 1997 20:01:40 UTC