- From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 1997 15:56:49 +0000
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 12:33 4/3/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: >5.1.a Shall we support a mechanism for a document to contain a list of >other documents that someone thinks ought to processed with it, in order >to find linking elements pointing into the first document, and in general >create a web of related documents? Yes >5.1.b If so, shall we say anything normative about whether this must be >done? There are two possibilities here: 1) Make it an optional feature of browsers and require that documents requiring this feature have an initial processing instruction that says that they require a browser that supports this option 2) Require all XML browsers to support the feature through normative text. > >5.1.c Should we use an SGML element, a PI, or some other construct to hold >this list of documents? An SGML element > >5.1.d If we use an element, what should it be called? <XREFERENCES> or <ATTACHMENTS>? >5.1.e If we use an SGML element, should we have subelements per referenced >doc or just a token-separated list of entity names in a single attribute? >In either case what should the subelement (if any) and attributes be >called? > Subelements per referenced doc. <XREFERENCE> or <ATTACHMENT> ---- Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 WWW home page: http://www.sgml.u-net.com/
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 1997 10:58:46 UTC