- From: David Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 13:06:03 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 8:03 AM +0000 3/2/97, Martin Bryan wrote: >In some cases they will have a different significance, in others they may >not. One useful difference I could envisage is that fragment identifiers in >the embedded elements could refer to the document identified by the >container, rather than to the document they are embedded within. e.g. > ><a href="oii/oiistand.htm">OII Standards and Specification List ><a href="#SGML">SGML</a> ><a href="#XML">XML</a> ></a> This seems to complicate the model, and isn't necessary if we have an equivalent of BASE or LOCSRC. I would leave this out as being purely a convenience feature unless we don't have an equivalent way to specify an alternative addressing origin (or LOCSRC or base address or whatever you want to call it) -- David _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 1997 13:31:21 UTC