- From: Paul Grosso <paul@arbortext.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 97 16:51:54 CST
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
I have some questions about the May 5 XML Link draft, section 3.2, Extended link: 1. The content model for XML-LOCATOR is ANY. I would have expected it to be EMPTY. What is it supposed to mean to give the XML-LOCATOR element content? What are the expected processing implications? 2. the XML-XLINK element has an HRTYPE attribute. Being as XML-XLINK has no HREF attribute, what does its HRTYPE attribute mean/do? 3. LOCSRC and IMPLIED-LOCSRC are only on XML-XLINK, but I would have thought they both could vary per locator rather than per link. As written, it seems you can't have a different locsrc on different locators. Unless I'm missing something, this seems like an uncomformable restriction. 4. Both XML-XLINK and XML-LOCATOR have attributes of: HRTYPE TITLE BEHAVIOR SHOW ACTUATE What are the differences in processing expectations of each of these attributes depending on whether they are on the XML-XLINK element or the XML-LOCATOR element. If, in any case, the attribute of the same name has the same meaning on both elements, what is supposed to happen when both are specified and they aren't identical? Perhaps I'm missing a major paradigm here. I would have expected something more like the following given what I feel are link-related versus locator-related: ATTLIST XML-XLINK XML-LINK ROLE TITLE BEHAVIOR (maybe) ATTLIST XML-LOCATOR XML-LINK ROLE TITLE (maybe) HREF HRTYPE LOCSRC IMPLIED-LOCSRC BEHAVIOR SHOW ACTUATE I'm not violently opposed to having the attributes in both places if that helps cover some extra cases, but then it seems we have to discuss processing expectations some more or we could have lots of interoperability problems (e.g., one app uses the XLINK's SHOW attribute but another uses the LOCATOR's SHOW attribute). paul
Received on Saturday, 8 March 1997 18:23:12 UTC