- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 07:36:38 -0800
- To: W3C-SGML-WG@w3.org
At 03:13 PM 10/03/97 +0000, Lou Burnard wrote: >I would like the >ERB to reconsider its decision to disallow the spanning mechanism defined by >echte TEI x-pointers. For the record, no such decisions have been made. In the initial draft, Steve pulled out a TEI subset that he thought was good, I reviewed it and it seemed sensible to me, and that's what's there. The ERB has yet to take up the question of what TEI subset to use. Request for information: what TEI xptr implementations are there? And what do they implement? I'm going to be *very* reluctant to vote for anything, no matter how cool & peachy-keen, that nobody is actually using. Finally, I take very seriously the comment (from whom I forget) that the current partial-references to the large & imposing TEI docs are out of place in XML-Link - we need a subset that we can describe in our kind of page budget in a standalone way. - Tim
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 1997 10:47:23 UTC