- From: Paul Grosso <paul@arbortext.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 97 12:39:22 CST
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> From: lee@sq.com > > Terry Allan wote: > > Docbook allows tag minimization in the DTD but sets OMITTAG NO in the > > sdecl. [...] But for those users who want to substitute their own > > sdecl with OMITTAG YES, we'd want to keep the tag minimization. > > Note that you can do this, if you really must, with a parameter entity: > <!Entity % OO " O O"> > <!Entity % XO " - O"> > <!Entity % OX " O -"> > <!Entity % XX " - -"> > > <!Element title %OX; (%title.model;)> I think you've made part of my case: having to do ridiculous things as you show above is a good argument for changing XML to allow (and ignore) omitted tag minimization specs. > > > Since amost all DTDs written with the expectation of minimisation will > require changes before they work in XML, allowing this syntax is at best > misleading. First, XML has OMITTAG NO which a priori makes it clear that tags cannot be omitted despite the omitted tag minimization specs. As far as I am concerned, this is the end of the "misleading" argument. Second, forget the entire train of thought about HTML and/or legacy DTDs. That's not the key point. Instead, the point is that we want to be able to write (probably new) DTDs that will work with both full SGML systems and XML systems. For example, we might want to produce a new SGML Open Exchange Table Model that is XML compliant, but we also want to be able to use the new model with full SGML systems that allow minimization. No one has argued that allowing and ignoring the omitted tag specs is difficult to implement. Granted, it's one more thing in the language, but if the alternative are either parameter entities like Lee shows above or configuration hassles because everyone will need to keep an XML version and an SGML version of every DTD fragment (which will only serve to exaggerate the perception that XML isn't SGML), then I think we should change XML to allow the omitted tag minimization specs. paul
Received on Monday, 17 March 1997 13:46:00 UTC