spec-prod@w3.org from October to December 2015 by date

Thursday, 31 December 2015

RE: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Todd Reifsteck

Monday, 21 December 2015

Re: Echidna now supports TAR files Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: Echidna now supports TAR files Denis Ah-Kang

Thursday, 17 December 2015

modernizing W3C's mailing list archives Gerald Oskoboiny
Minutes: Using GitHub for W3C Specifications Ian Jacobs
Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Nigel Megitt
Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Ivan Herman
Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Nigel Megitt
Re: Echidna now supports TAR files Antonio Olmo Titos

Wednesday, 16 December 2015

Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: Echidna now supports TAR files Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Respec docs without all the W3C boilerplate Shane McCarron
Re: Respec docs without all the W3C boilerplate Tab Atkins Jr.
Re: Respec docs without all the W3C boilerplate Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 15 December 2015

Respec docs without all the W3C boilerplate ishida@w3.org
Echidna now supports TAR files Antonio Olmo Titos

Friday, 11 December 2015

Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Adrian Hope-Bailie

Thursday, 10 December 2015

Re: [respec] Automatic conversion between WebIDL oldschool and contiguous Shane McCarron
[respec] Automatic conversion between WebIDL oldschool and contiguous Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Arthur Barstow
[Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 Xueyuan Jia

Thursday, 3 December 2015

New publication workflow: Echidna 1.4.0, Specberus 1.3.0 Antonio Olmo Titos

Wednesday, 2 December 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Shane McCarron
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Philippe Le Hegaret

Monday, 30 November 2015

Sunday, 29 November 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Marcos Caceres
Re: Underline visibility (Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016) Marcos Caceres

Monday, 23 November 2015

W3C makes its data available through a Web API Vivien Lacourba

Friday, 20 November 2015

Underline visibility (Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016) Bert Bos

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts? fantasai

Friday, 13 November 2015

Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts? Shane McCarron
Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts? fantasai
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 ishida@w3.org
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Shane McCarron

Thursday, 12 November 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Shane McCarron
Re: Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts? Shane McCarron
Can we please update Respec to support the new TR style for ED drafts? ishida@w3.org
TOC Sidebar (Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016) Doug Schepers

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Michiel Bijl
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Edward O'Connor
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Michiel Bijl
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Michiel Bijl
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Michiel Bijl
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Alan Stearns
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Edward O'Connor
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Edward O'Connor
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Michiel Bijl
RE: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 John Foliot
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Belfanti, Paul
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Carlos A Velasco

Friday, 6 November 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 ishida@w3.org
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Shane McCarron
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 ishida@w3.org
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 David Carlisle
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Tab Atkins Jr.

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 David Singer
RE: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Steve Glaser
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 T.V Raman
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Annette Greiner
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Bert Bos

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Marcos Caceres
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 fantasai
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Marcos Caceres
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Edward O'Connor

Friday, 30 October 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Ivan Herman
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 fantasai
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 fantasai
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 fantasai
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Ivan Herman
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 fantasai
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 marcos@marcosc.com
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Shane McCarron
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Giuseppe Pascale
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Tobie Langel

Thursday, 29 October 2015

Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Shane McCarron
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Giuseppe Pascale
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Shane McCarron
Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Tobie Langel
Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016 Coralie Mercier

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Re: Support for the new W3C license? Marcos Caceres
Re: Support for the new W3C license? Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Support for the new W3C license? Marcos Caceres

Friday, 2 October 2015

Re: Support for the new W3C license? Denis Ah-Kang
Re: Support for the new W3C license? Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository timeless
Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository Sangwhan Moon
Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository Doug Schepers
Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository Antonio Olmo Titos

Last message date: Thursday, 31 December 2015 21:42:57 UTC