Re: Proposed Final Design for W3C Technical Reports style in 2016

Sorry - I missed that you had replied to me!  Some comments inline

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:26 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
wrote:

> On 10/30/2015 08:39 AM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>> Looks pretty good. A couple of comments:
>>
>> 1) The ToC on the side is sexy.  It would be nice if it were collapsible,
>> and it would be nice if it highlighted which section was being viewed.
>>
>
> That would be cool, but would also require JavaScript. :) It's just a
> style sheet.
>
> 2) ReSpec has the ability to have titles on notes and examples.  I assume
>> these changes that into account?
>>
>
> I'll have to double-check. Can you point me at an example?


Sure.   See http://pandora.aptest.com/w3c/example.html - NOTE: this example
uses an experimental ReSpec that is hooking in your changes.


>
> 3) Are there changes we can be making to ReSpec now so that it takes
>> advantage of your changes?
>>
>
> Yes, but give me until next week to document what they are? :) I'm
> definitely
> looking forward to ReSpec and Bikeshed being updated, it will help everyone
> transition.


I look forward to seeing that documentation!


>
>
> 4) How can we help?
>>
>
> File issues, or suggest fixes to open issues! And, of course, integrate the
> new styles into ReSpec. ;)


Working on it now.


>
>
> ~fantasai
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 12 November 2015 16:10:39 UTC