W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:07:01 -0400
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org, W3C Team <w3t@w3.org>, Chairs <chairs@w3.org>, Systeam <w3t-sys@w3.org>
Message-ID: <560E02E5.7030601@w3.org>
+1 to all of Tobi's suggestion on this thread.

In particular, I read the Team-only wiki page, and there's nothing there 
that couldn't be public. Public resources are more likely to be 
maintained, and more likely to help others understand our publication 


On 7/29/15 3:18 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015, at 05:00, Antonio Olmo Titos wrote:
>> On 28/07/15 Tobie wrote:
>>> Would be good to at least have wiki/index page consistency (i.e. make
>>> them both member-only, or better:  both public).
>> I don't think that is useful or even advisable, Tobie.
>> These wiki pages we use to discuss low-level technical details; they may
>> contain info about our implementation, systems, etc.
> I wouldn't know since I don't have access to them.
>> I just changed copy and style to make it more clear that's a secondary
>> resource, available only to the team.
> My point still holds, though. Either the info is useful and it should be
> open or it's not and it shouldn't be mentioned.
> Currently it just feels like there are completely artificial
> confidentiality rings for no (good) reason whatsoever.
> Just my CHF 0.02. :)
> --tobie
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 04:07:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:21 UTC