W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Introducing W3C's JavaScript repository

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:07:01 -0400
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org, W3C Team <w3t@w3.org>, Chairs <chairs@w3.org>, Systeam <w3t-sys@w3.org>
Message-ID: <560E02E5.7030601@w3.org>
+1 to all of Tobi's suggestion on this thread.

In particular, I read the Team-only wiki page, and there's nothing there 
that couldn't be public. Public resources are more likely to be 
maintained, and more likely to help others understand our publication 
processes.

Regards–
–Doug

On 7/29/15 3:18 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015, at 05:00, Antonio Olmo Titos wrote:
>> On 28/07/15 Tobie wrote:
>>> Would be good to at least have wiki/index page consistency (i.e. make
>>> them both member-only, or better:  both public).
>>
>> I don't think that is useful or even advisable, Tobie.
>> These wiki pages we use to discuss low-level technical details; they may
>> contain info about our implementation, systems, etc.
>
> I wouldn't know since I don't have access to them.
>
>> I just changed copy and style to make it more clear that's a secondary
>> resource, available only to the team.
>
> My point still holds, though. Either the info is useful and it should be
> open or it's not and it shouldn't be mentioned.
>
> Currently it just feels like there are completely artificial
> confidentiality rings for no (good) reason whatsoever.
>
> Just my CHF 0.02. :)
>
> --tobie
>
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 04:07:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:21 UTC