W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Support for the new W3C license?

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0700
Message-Id: <201510071711.t97HBAKh009203@d03av05.boulder.ibm.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
Hi Marcos,
There is no more problem. We've now successfully published two specs with 
the new license using Echidna.
Thanks everyone for the help.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group


Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote on 10/07/2015 09:47:22 AM:

> From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
> Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
> Date: 10/07/2015 09:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Support for the new W3C license?
> 
> Can someone help me spot the differences in the ReSpec output? I'm 
> having a hard time seeing them. 
> 
> 
> 
> On October 2, 2015 at 1:25:02 PM, Denis Ah-Kang (denis@w3.org) wrote:
> > Hi Arnaud,
> > 
> > The copyright in [1] should be updated:
> > [[
> >
> 
> > > href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright
">Copyright 
> >  2015 W3C (> href="http://www.csail.mit.edu/">MIT, > 
> title="European Research Consortium for Informatics and
> > Mathematics">ERCIM, > href="http://www.keio.ac.jp/">Keio, > href="
> http://ev.buaa.edu.cn/">Beihang), All Rights Reserved. > 
> title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C > href="http://www.w3.org/
> Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer">
> > liability, > href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-
> notice#W3C_Trademarks">trademark 
> > and > href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2015/copyright-
> software-and-document">permissive 
> > document license rules apply.
> >
> 
> 
> > ]]
> > 
> > Also the date/uris should match the current date.
> > 
> > Hope that helps,
> > 
> > Denis
> > 
> > [1]
> > http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/
> activitystreams-core/Overview.html 
> > 
> > 
> > On 10/2/15 19:51, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> > > Hi Denis,
> > > Unfortunately I'm told there is still a problem:
> > >
> > > From: James M Snell 
> > > To: Sandro Hawke , Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > > Date: 10/01/2015 08:37 AM
> > > Subject: still having echidna issues
> > > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Attempting to publish the updated drafts with the new license. Still
> > > getting errors related to the copyright statement.
> > >
> > > Name: ascore
> > > URL:
> > > http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/
> activitystreams-core/manifest 
> > > Status Key: 31b1b7da-4f87-42d9-9b53-4d2ba7acd7ff
> > > Last Attempt: 2015-10-01T15:25:11.877Z
> > > id
> > > 31b1b7da-4f87-42d9-9b53-4d2ba7acd7ff
> > > url
> > > http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/
> activitystreams-core/manifest 
> > > version 1.3.1
> > > version-specberus 1.2.1
> > > decision
> > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-09-15-minutes
> > > results.status failure
> > > results.jobs.retrieve-resources.status ok
> > > results.jobs.retrieve-resources.errors
> > > results.jobs.specberus.status failure
> > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.0.key no-match
> > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.0.type headers.copyright
> > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.key link-text
> > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.extra.href
> > > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents
> > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.extra.text document use
> > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.type headers.copyright
> > >
> > > --
> > > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web 
Technologies -
> > > IBM Software Group
> > >
> > >
> > > Denis Ah-Kang wrote on 09/29/2015 09:37:34 PM:
> > >
> > > > From: Denis Ah-Kang 
> > > > To: Marcos Caceres , Philippe Le Hegaret
> > > > , Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
> > > > Date: 09/29/2015 09:37 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Support for the new W3C license?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 09/30/2015 12:17 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > > > > On September 29, 2015 at 2:34:28 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret
> > > (plh@w3.org) wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 09/29/2015 01:39 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> > > > >>> The text differs so respec would need to be fixed but... I 
still
> > > can't
> > > > >>> get specberus (the pubrules checker used for automatic 
> publishing) to
> > > > >>> accept a text. So still looking around before propose a change
> > > somewhere.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We need a fix for respec:
> > > > >> https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/509
> > > > >>
> > > > >> and the latest of specberus to get deployed.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Should be all in sync within 12 hours or so.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixed in ReSpec.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Specberus and Echidna have been deployed with the latest updates.
> > > >
> > > > Denis
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2015 17:11:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:21 UTC