- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:11:08 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
- Message-Id: <201510071711.t97HBAKh009203@d03av05.boulder.ibm.com>
Hi Marcos, There is no more problem. We've now successfully published two specs with the new license using Echidna. Thanks everyone for the help. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Software Group Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote on 10/07/2015 09:47:22 AM: > From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org> > Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org > Date: 10/07/2015 09:53 AM > Subject: Re: Support for the new W3C license? > > Can someone help me spot the differences in the ReSpec output? I'm > having a hard time seeing them. > > > > On October 2, 2015 at 1:25:02 PM, Denis Ah-Kang (denis@w3.org) wrote: > > Hi Arnaud, > > > > The copyright in [1] should be updated: > > [[ > > > > > > href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright ">Copyright > > © 2015 W3C® (> href="http://www.csail.mit.edu/">MIT, > > title="European Research Consortium for Informatics and > > Mathematics">ERCIM, > href="http://www.keio.ac.jp/">Keio, > href=" > http://ev.buaa.edu.cn/">Beihang), All Rights Reserved. > > title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C > href="http://www.w3.org/ > Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer"> > > liability, > href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr- > notice#W3C_Trademarks">trademark > > and > href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2015/copyright- > software-and-document">permissive > > document license rules apply. > > > > > > ]] > > > > Also the date/uris should match the current date. > > > > Hope that helps, > > > > Denis > > > > [1] > > http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/ > activitystreams-core/Overview.html > > > > > > On 10/2/15 19:51, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > > > Hi Denis, > > > Unfortunately I'm told there is still a problem: > > > > > > From: James M Snell > > > To: Sandro Hawke , Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS > > > Date: 10/01/2015 08:37 AM > > > Subject: still having echidna issues > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Attempting to publish the updated drafts with the new license. Still > > > getting errors related to the copyright statement. > > > > > > Name: ascore > > > URL: > > > http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/ > activitystreams-core/manifest > > > Status Key: 31b1b7da-4f87-42d9-9b53-4d2ba7acd7ff > > > Last Attempt: 2015-10-01T15:25:11.877Z > > > id > > > 31b1b7da-4f87-42d9-9b53-4d2ba7acd7ff > > > url > > > http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/ > activitystreams-core/manifest > > > version 1.3.1 > > > version-specberus 1.2.1 > > > decision > > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-09-15-minutes > > > results.status failure > > > results.jobs.retrieve-resources.status ok > > > results.jobs.retrieve-resources.errors > > > results.jobs.specberus.status failure > > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.0.key no-match > > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.0.type headers.copyright > > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.key link-text > > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.extra.href > > > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents > > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.extra.text document use > > > results.jobs.specberus.errors.1.type headers.copyright > > > > > > -- > > > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - > > > IBM Software Group > > > > > > > > > Denis Ah-Kang wrote on 09/29/2015 09:37:34 PM: > > > > > > > From: Denis Ah-Kang > > > > To: Marcos Caceres , Philippe Le Hegaret > > > > , Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS > > > > Cc: spec-prod@w3.org > > > > Date: 09/29/2015 09:37 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Support for the new W3C license? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09/30/2015 12:17 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > > > On September 29, 2015 at 2:34:28 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret > > > (plh@w3.org) wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On 09/29/2015 01:39 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > > > >>> The text differs so respec would need to be fixed but... I still > > > can't > > > > >>> get specberus (the pubrules checker used for automatic > publishing) to > > > > >>> accept a text. So still looking around before propose a change > > > somewhere. > > > > >> > > > > >> We need a fix for respec: > > > > >> https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/509 > > > > >> > > > > >> and the latest of specberus to get deployed. > > > > >> > > > > >> Should be all in sync within 12 hours or so. > > > > > > > > > > Fixed in ReSpec. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Specberus and Echidna have been deployed with the latest updates. > > > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2015 17:11:46 UTC