- From: Todd Reifsteck <toddreif@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 21:42:25 +0000
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
And in case it wasn't obvious, big props to Ilya Grigorik for putting this dashboard together! -----Original Message----- From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 5:14 AM To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>; chairs@w3.org; spec-prod@w3.org; Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org> Subject: Re: [Project review] How to make the best of GitHub for your specification? - 17 December 2015 On 12/17/2015 04:57 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Philippe (or anyone) > > I saw the reference to http://www.w3.org/2010/webperf/board/, which is a really nice tool. Is this tool generally available so that a group can pick it up and adapt it to a specific group? The source of that code is at https://github.com/w3c/webperf-dashboard available under the MIT license. Dominique has been playing with it as well to adapt it for the WebRTC WG. > > https://labs.w3.org/hatchery/midgard/ > > but I am not sure it is still actively managed (and not all > repositories are automatically added to it from github in the > configuration panel, although that would make it really useful…). But > the webperf dashboard seems to be handier insofar as it is based on > open issues as opposed to each comments as separate items… I've also started to play with the webperf dashboard and the w3c api to see the possibilities there. But that's only vague attempts so far. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 31 December 2015 21:42:57 UTC