public-webappsec@w3.org from December 2014 by author

Adrienne Porter Felt

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)

Alex Gaynor

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 13 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)

Alex Russell

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 24 December)

Andy Wingo

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: MIX: Exiting last call? (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Service Workers and MIX (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Comments on Mixed Content (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Clarifying how CSP sandboxing applies to Workers, ServiceWorkers (Wednesday, 3 December)

Austin William Wright

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 24 December)

Ben Toews

• Re: [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need error reporting? (Wednesday, 10 December)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Tuesday, 2 December)
• [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Tuesday, 2 December)

Brad Hill

• Re: [CSP] different perspective on Report-Only (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Allow plugin-types "none" (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Allow paths without a domain (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [SRI] providing good defaults when the expected content type is missing? (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [SRI] unsupported hashes and invalid metadata (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Reminder: today's webappsec teleconference CANCELED (Monday, 29 December)
• [webappsec] Next WebAppSec teleconference (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• postMessage, workers and sandboxing (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Teleconference Agenda, Monday 14-Dec-2014 (Friday, 12 December)
• [webappsec] Teleconference Agenda, Monday 14-Dec-2014 (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need error reporting? (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Dec 1, Thread 1: Rechartering (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Clarifying how CSP sandboxing applies to Workers, ServiceWorkers (Monday, 1 December)
• [webappsec] Clarifying how CSP sandboxing applies to Workers, ServiceWorkers (Monday, 1 December)
• [webappsec] Dec 1, Thread 3: post-Last Call issues in CSP Level 2 (Monday, 1 December)
• [webappsec] Dec 1, Thread 2: Powerful Features (Monday, 1 December)
• [webappsec] Dec 1, Thread 1: Rechartering (Monday, 1 December)
• [webappsec] Cancel today's call? (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: snapshots in CfC Re: CfC: Publish a FPWD of "Requirements for Powerful Features" (Monday, 1 December)

Brian Smith

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Teleconference Agenda, Monday 14-Dec-2014 (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: MIX: Exiting last call? (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need error reporting? (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need fallback/noncanonical-src? (Thursday, 11 December)
• [REFERRER][CSP] Improving the Web Platform's Referrer Policy (Wednesday, 3 December)

chaals@yandex-team.ru

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Security UI Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: snapshots in CfC Re: CfC: Publish a FPWD of "Requirements for Powerful Features" (Tuesday, 2 December)

Chris Bentzel

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)

Chris Palmer

• Re: [SRI] unsupported hashes and invalid metadata (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: Public Key Pinning (was Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure) (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 13 December)
• Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments on Mixed Content (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)

Christian Heutger

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 13 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)

Coralie Mercier

• Call for Exclusions: Requirements for Powerful Features (Thursday, 4 December)

Craig Francis

• [CSP3] Allow plugin-types "none" (Tuesday, 30 December)
• [CSP3] Allow paths without a domain (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 20 December)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)

Daniel Veditz

• Re: MIX: Exiting last call? (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)

David Booth

• [REFERRER] feedback - Editorial comment: s/referer/Referer/g (Friday, 26 December)

David Walp

• Comments on Mixed Content (Wednesday, 10 December)

Deian Stefan

• Re: webappsec-ISSUE-69 (Overt channel control in CSP): Consider directives to manage postMessage and external navigation of iframes [CSP Next] (Monday, 1 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Clarifying how CSP sandboxing applies to Workers, ServiceWorkers (Monday, 1 December)

Devdatta Akhawe

• Re: [SRI] unsupported hashes and invalid metadata (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need error reporting? (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need fallback/noncanonical-src? (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need error reporting? (Wednesday, 10 December)

Domenic Denicola

• RE: [blink-dev] Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)

Donald Stufft

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)

Eduardo Robles Elvira

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 13 December)

Eduardo' Vela\

• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)

Eric Mill

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 30 December)

Francois Marier

• Re: [SRI] unsupported hashes and invalid metadata (Tuesday, 30 December)
• [SRI] providing good defaults when the expected content type is missing? (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [SRI] unsupported hashes and invalid metadata (Monday, 29 December)
• [SRI] unsupported hashes and invalid metadata (Wednesday, 24 December)

Frederik Braun

• Re: [webappsec] Teleconference Agenda, Monday 14-Dec-2014 (Sunday, 14 December)
• [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need error reporting? (Wednesday, 10 December)
• [SRI] Towards v1 - do we need fallback/noncanonical-src? (Wednesday, 10 December)

Gervase Markham

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)

Giorgio Maone

• Re: [webappsec] Teleconference Agenda, Monday 14-Dec-2014 (Friday, 12 December)

gshollingsworth@gmail.com

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 21 December)

Håvard Molland

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)

ianG

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)

Igor Bukanov

• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 13 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)

Jeffrey Walton

• Re: Public Key Pinning (was Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure) (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: Public Key Pinning (was Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure) (Saturday, 27 December)
• Public Key Pinning (was Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure) (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 24 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)

Jim Manico

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 26 December)

Jiri Danek

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 20 December)

Joel Weinberger

• [CSP] How to interpret 'self' in a sandboxed iframe (Tuesday, 30 December)

jstriegel@google.com

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [CSP3] Please define the encoding used for violation reports (Tuesday, 2 December)

Ludwig, Sven

• AW: [CSP] different perspective on Report-Only (Tuesday, 30 December)
• AW: [CSP] different perspective on Report-Only (Monday, 29 December)
• [CSP] different perspective on Report-Only (Saturday, 27 December)

Mark Watson

• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [CSP] different perspective on Report-Only (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)

Mathias Bynens

• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 13 December)

Matthew Dempsky

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)

Michael Cooper

• Re: [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Wednesday, 17 December)
• [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Wednesday, 10 December)

Michael Martinez

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)

michaelhorowitz@gmail.com

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)

Michal Zalewski

• Re: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)

Mike O'Neill

• RE: [REFERRER][CSP] Improving the Web Platform's Referrer Policy (Friday, 12 December)

Mike West

• Re: [CSP] different perspective on Report-Only (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: [CSP] different perspective on Report-Only (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: [SRI] unsupported hashes and invalid metadata (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [REFERRER] feedback - Editorial comment: s/referer/Referer/g (Friday, 26 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Next WebAppSec teleconference (Sunday, 21 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Strict mixed content checking (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Service Workers and MIX (was Re: MIX: Exiting last call?) (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: MIX: Exiting last call? (Monday, 15 December)
• MIX: Exiting last call? (Friday, 12 December)
• Re: [MIX] PF comments on Mixed Content - accessible indication and user controls (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: Comments on Mixed Content (Thursday, 11 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• [POWER] New vs Legacy functionality (Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.) (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [REFERRER][CSP] Improving the Web Platform's Referrer Policy (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: Draft finding - "Transitioning the Web to HTTPS" (Tuesday, 9 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Dec 1, Thread 2: Powerful Features (Tuesday, 2 December)

Monica Chew

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: [webappsec] Dec 1, Thread 1: Rechartering (Tuesday, 2 December)

Patrick Kolodziejczyk

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• RE: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)

Peter Bowen

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 14 December)

Peter Kasting

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)

Ryan Sleevi

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 30 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 29 December)
• Re: Public Key Pinning (was Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure) (Sunday, 28 December)
• Why not DNS records Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Sunday, 28 December)
• Re: Public Key Pinning (was Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure) (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 27 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Saturday, 20 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Thursday, 18 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 15 December)

Sigbjørn Vik

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Tuesday, 16 December)

softwaredevjirka@gmail.com

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)

sourcekick

• [REFERRER] Combination of referrer directive values (Sunday, 28 December)

Stephen Gallagher

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)

Tyler Larson

• Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Friday, 19 December)

tylerl@google.com

• Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure (Wednesday, 17 December)

Web Application Security Working Group Issue Tracker

• webappsec-ISSUE-74 (plugin-types 'none'): allow explicitly setting the 'none' keyword source for plugin-type directive [CSP Level 3] (Tuesday, 30 December)
• webappsec-ISSUE-73 (CSP path matching): Consider allowing relative paths (to 'self') in source productions [CSP Level 3] (Tuesday, 30 December)
• webappsec-ACTION-208: Take charter to w3m for review (Monday, 15 December)

Wendy Seltzer

• Fwd: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Application Security Working Group (Call for Review) (Tuesday, 23 December)
• Re: [webappsec] Dec 1, Thread 2: Powerful Features (Tuesday, 2 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 December 2014 23:07:32 UTC