I took a stab at both of these suggestions in https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/commit/13394bb58c7613440ef42f61c6d500df8501b9c9 . WDYT? -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: >> >> > I took a stab at this in >> > https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#restrictions. >> > Feedback? >> >> """If result is Insecure, then [insert something appropriate here: >> perhaps you could reject a Promise, call an error callback, deny a >> permission request, etc.].""" >> >> How about: >> >> """If result is Insecure, then the callee could for example reject the >> Promise, callback a caller's error handler, deny a permission request, >> or return an empty or lower-resolution result object.""" >> > > The goal was to be copy/paste-able. In that case, I'd prefer to keep > something in the text that looks obviously wrong so that the spec author > would realize that she needed to put something reasonable in there. > > I guess that wasn't clear. :) > > I'll attempt to clarify. > > -mike > > -- > Mike West <mkwst@google.com> > Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 > > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany > Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg > Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores > (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) >
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2014 19:57:44 UTC