On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Ryan Sleevi <rsleevi@chromium.org> wrote: > ... > You seem to be operating from quite a bit of confusion about pinning or how > it works, and from that have drawn a number or inaccurate I think I have quite a good idea about how pinning works. I was using it as a security control long before the draft was proposed to the IETF. > (and, in some > cases, inflammatory) conclusions. Well, I'm not sure what to say. If holding leaders responsible, then I am guilty as charged. > Rather than cross-posting to a variety of lists on an unrelated thread, > perhaps it best to continue the discussions in the IETF. My apologies to other lists. I'm going to add WebCrypto to this one since the reply below seems very relevant. > There is no shadowy committee politiking for compromise waiting for you > there - it was simply a bad and inherently inconsistent idea removed, > recognized as such by technically savvy people during the process of > standardizing. Oh, the irony of your earlier ad hominem claims. The best I can tell, you been running rough shot over every group you've been a member of. When someone disagrees with you, you regress precisely into personal attacks. Your behavior has particularly distasteful on WebCrypto, and you've been criticized quite a few times for it by others. >From WebCrypto, you probably realized that I try not to engage in the personal attacks and insults. That seems to have promoted your poor behavior. I suppose I'm partially to blame because I allowed it to happen in an effort to improve harmony. My apologies for that. JeffReceived on Saturday, 27 December 2014 23:52:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:44 UTC