- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 04:54:59 +1100
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>, public-webappsec@w3.org
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, at 04:41, Brad Hill wrote: > OK, so I missed my own deadline, but did get feedback. > > Can folks live with the following charter edits around Permission API to > clarify the scope? > > Current: > > "Permissions API > > Create and advance a recommendation to allow web applications to be aware > of the status of a given permission, to know whether it is granted, > denied, or if the user will be asked whether the permission should be > granted." > > Proposed: > > "Permissions API > > Create and advance a recommendation to allow web applications to be aware > of the status of a given permission, to know whether it is granted, > denied, or if the user will be asked whether the permission should be > granted. This specification will expose the current state of, and allow > triggering a request for a permissions grant with an API. This > recommendation will not address user agent implementations of > permissions, > including their scope, duration, granularity, or user interface and > experience for indicating, configuring, or asking for permissions." SGTM -- Mounir
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 17:55:23 UTC