[SRI] Towards v1 - do we need fallback/noncanonical-src?

I am leaning towards taking the current state and calling it a v1 around

This includes mostly what Chromium has in Canary (Firefox has a
work-in-progress patch that is aligned with what Chromium does, modulo
the authenticated origin discussion, that should happen in another thread).

It seems that both sides are OK with implementing
fallback/noncanonical-src attributes (allows loading the resource from
another location, if the integrity check fails). But we are not sure
whether it should be included in v1.

So, the question is: What do web developers want?

I'm slightly leaning towards no, as a local shim could always check if
something has been declared or not.

(I'll start another thread about error reporting in a minute)

Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2014 17:39:41 UTC