- From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:43:30 +0000
- To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, blink-dev <blink-dev@chromium.org>, security-dev <security-dev@chromium.org>, mozilla-dev-security@lists.mozilla.org
- To: mozilla-dev-security@lists.mozilla.org
[The trouble with having this conversation across many mailing lists is that when it gets specific, but you want to include people, you don't know which lists to drop...] On 18/12/14 22:10, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Four proposed fine-tunings: > > A) i don't think we should remove "This website does not supply > identity information" -- but maybe replace it with "The identity of this > site is unconfirmed" or "The true identity of this site is unknown" I prefer a more positive statement to a negative one, certainly. > ------- > The true identity of this site is unknown. > > This web page was transferred over a non-secure connection, which means > that the page and any information you sent to it could have been read or > modified by others while in transit. That's past tense; don't we want to include the future too? The true identity of this site cannot be confirmed. Your connection to this site is non-secure. Therefore, any information you send or receive can be read or modified by others while in transit. Gerv
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 11:44:04 UTC