Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com> wrote:
> I respectfully, but strongly, disagree :) If you want to separate the
> states, I'd say that C is better than B. C has *some* security, B has
> *none*.

You would advocate not blocking on certificate failures and just hand
over credentials to network attackers? What would happen exactly when
you visit e.g. google.com from the airport (connected to something
with a shitty captive portal)?


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2014 17:17:50 UTC