Re: [blink-dev] Re: Proposal: Marking HTTP As Non-Secure

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Monica Chew <mmc@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>
>> I understand the desire here, but a passive indicator is not going to
>> change the status quo if it's shown 42% of the time (or 67% of the time, in
>> Firefox's case).
>>
>
> Which is presumably why the key question this thread asked is what metrics
> to use to decide it makes sense to start showing these warnings, and what
> the thresholds should be.
>

OK. I think the thresholds should be < 5%, preferably < 1%. What do you
think they should be?

Also I was wrong about collapsing fragment navigation, and that probably
explains the difference between FF and Chrome.

Thanks,
Monica

>