Full R2RML Review after ISSUE-68 and ISSUE-73 are resolved
2011-12-20 meeting minutes
- ISSUE-57 and ISSUE-72 implemented (was: Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes)
- Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC
regrets for 20-Dec-2011 meeting
Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
Handling Last Call Comments
Diff of post-LC R2RML changes
Minutes from Dec 13 Telcon
Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables)
ISSUE-78 (namespace-bugs): Minor bug in namespace document [Namespace]
tableName syntactic sugar (ISSUE-75)
Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal
What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?