Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?

What are the questions? Apologies if they are posted somewhere and I'm the
only one who doesn't know about it.

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>wrote:
>
>> > Richard - There are several questions identified in Issue-75. It seems
>> to me that we should hash out consensus on those questions before including
>> this syntactic sugar to the spec.
>>
>
>
>> It *is* already in the spec and has been for many months. There were no
>> objections raised when this feature when it was first proposed. The R2RML
>> ED went to Last Call, including this feature, with the consensus of the WG.
>>
>
> To complete the story...
>
> And a comment came up during Last Call. We discussed the feature in the
> "face-to-face" and there was agreement that there were several un-answered
> questions about the feature. We didn't have time to resolve the issues in
> the face-to-face. An issue was created to capture those questions. Now I
> would expect the process would be to work the issue, rather than to dismiss
> the issue.
>
> -David
>

Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 19:30:23 UTC