Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?

Yes.  We should discuss the questions that are listed under Issue-75.
All the best, Ashok

On 12/6/2011 11:23 AM, David McNeil wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de <mailto:richard@cyganiak.de>> wrote:
>
>     > Richard - There are several questions identified in Issue-75. It seems to me that we should hash out consensus on those questions before including this syntactic sugar to the spec.
>
>     It *is* already in the spec and has been for many months. There were no objections raised when this feature when it was first proposed. The R2RML ED went to Last Call, including this feature, with the consensus of the WG.
>
>
> To complete the story...
>
> And a comment came up during Last Call. We discussed the feature in the "face-to-face" and there was agreement that there were several un-answered questions about the feature. We didn't have time to resolve the issues in the face-to-face. An issue was created to capture those questions. Now I would expect the process would be to work the issue, rather than to dismiss the issue.
>
> -David