- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:16:09 +0000
- To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Cc: RDB2RDF Working Group WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi David, There's an open issue that was raised in response to comments from you: ISSUE-75: Reconsider rr:tableName syntactic sugar http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/75 In last week's minutes you're recorded as saying: “there are still legitimate questions unanswered about Issue-75” [1] May I ask you what change you are seeking related to this issue, or what concerns you have regarding the design of this feature and its definition in the R2RML ED? Thanks, Richard [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/11/29-RDB2RDF-minutes.html#item04
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 16:16:51 UTC