Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes

Oh, one more clerical thing:

On 20 Dec 2011, at 18:02, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
> [[
> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-72 with no action. Add an example using an R2RML view.
> ]]

As was said in the call, it seems quite likely that a future R2RML 1.1 WG would want to revisit this issue. Therefore it should really be marked POSTPONED, and not CLOSED, right?

It's currently marked as pending review – maybe the chairs could switch it to POSTPONED?
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/72

Thanks,
Richard

Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 19:22:44 UTC