ISSUE-57 and ISSUE-72 implemented (was: Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes)

On 20 Dec 2011, at 18:02, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/12/20-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
> 
> [[
> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-72 with no action. Add an example using an R2RML view.
> ]]

Example added here:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#example-translationtable

> [[
> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-57 with:
> 1 An R2RML processor is a system that, given an R2RML mapping and an input database, provides access to the output dataset.
> 2 An RDF graph that represents an R2RML mapping is called an R2RML mapping graph.
> 3 An R2RML mapping document is any document written in the Turtle [TURTLE] RDF syntax that encodes an R2RML mapping graph.
> 4 A conforming R2RML processor SHOULD accept R2RML mapping documents in Turtle syntax. It MAY accept R2RML mapping graphs encoded in other RDF syntaxes.
> ]]

Implemented in the spec  this just required changing MUST to SHOULD in the last sentence.

1 is found here:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-r2rml-processor

2 is found here:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-r2rml-mapping-graph

3 and 4 are in this subsection:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#syntax

Best,
Richard

Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 19:05:41 UTC