Friday, 23 December 2011
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
- Re: ISSUE-57 and ISSUE-72 implemented (was: Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes)
- Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes
- ISSUE-57 and ISSUE-72 implemented (was: Re: 2011-12-20 meeting minutes)
- 2011-12-20 meeting minutes
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC
- RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-20 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: resignation from WG
- resignation from WG
Friday, 16 December 2011
Thursday, 15 December 2011
- Re: regrets for 20-Dec-2011 meeting
- regrets for 20-Dec-2011 meeting
- Re: Handling Last Call Comments
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: Handling Last Call Comments
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: Handling Last Call Comments
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
- Handling Last Call Comments
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables)
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Re: Diff of post-LC R2RML changes
- Diff of post-LC R2RML changes
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Minutes from Dec 13 Telcon
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Re: Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables)
- Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-12-13 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Re: Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables)
Monday, 12 December 2011
- Some implementation experience on ISSUE-72 (translation tables)
- Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72)
- Re: tableName syntactic sugar (ISSUE-75)
- ISSUE-78 (namespace-bugs): Minor bug in namespace document [Namespace]
Saturday, 10 December 2011
Friday, 9 December 2011
- Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal
- Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal
- Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal
Thursday, 8 December 2011
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
Tuesday, 6 December 2011
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal
- Re: What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- What issue does Revelytix have with the syntactic sugar for rr:tableName?
- What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax?
- Implementing ISSUE-77 resolution on XSD 1.1 dependency
- Implementing ISSUE-76 resolution (changed term type default rules)