Re: Comments needed – Re: Lookup table proposal (re ISSUE-72) from Richard Cyganiak on 2011-12-13 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from December 2011)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:42:07 +0000
To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <76112FD8-A2F5-4B75-9437-925FDB1F8A9C@cyganiak.de>

On 12 Dec 2011, at 19:43, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> All the other concerns and objections that were brought up could be easily resolved if that big issue was settled.
> 
> 1. “It requires another LC” – not necessarily, as Ivan said.

While reading older emails I realized that I misremembered what Ivan said. That was probably wishful thinking on my part! He was quite explicit that adding translation tables would lead to another LC [1]. 

Richard

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0013.html

Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 12:12:32 UTC