Re: please read before participating in translation scheme debate [Re: Translating DB values to RDF terms using 1) R2RML views and 2) using R2RML-native translation scheme]

Yes please! What do others think.

Souri, I have gone through both proposals and came to the conclusion that
they are practically the same. The only difference is the label of the
properties that you are using:

rr:translationMap ~= skos:inScheme
rr:fromTerm = skos:notation
rr:toTerm = skos:exactMatch

Other than that.. I see no difference. Basically, you are against SKOS.
Richard is for SKOS. Is there anything else I'm missing?


Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Souripriya Das
<SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com>wrote:

> Has anybody else looked at the "R2RML view" based translation scheme and
> examples in
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Translating_Database_Values_to_RDF_Terms
>
> If not, please do. I'd very interested in what you think about use of just
> R2RML views for specifying translation info.
> The power of "R2RML views" may be sufficient in practice.
>
> Thanks,
> - Souri.
>
>