Re: What is Oracle's objection to the use of Turtle as R2RML syntax? from Richard Cyganiak on 2011-12-07 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from December 2011)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:51:14 +0000
To: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <17F14405-5227-40FA-80D7-1DAB3CF19EE8@cyganiak.de>

On 7 Dec 2011, at 18:07, Souripriya Das wrote:
> Instead of the following definition of the mapping document:
> 
> [[
> An R2RML mapping document is any document written in the Turtle [TURTLE] RDF syntax that encodes an R2RML mapping graph.
> ]]
> 
> we propose the following:
> 
> [[
> An R2RML mapping document is any document that encodes an R2RML mapping graph and
> is written in any RDF syntax that is a W3C Recommendation and can be converted to Turtle [2].
> ]]

Why is this better?

Richard

Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 18:51:55 UTC