- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:53:03 +0000
- To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 10 Dec 2011, at 13:58, David McNeil wrote: > [ > PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-75 by removing the tableName syntactic sugar and simplifying the R2RML schema documentation and property table to reflect this. > ] I'm ok with this. It does nothing except saving like 20 characters per triples map; not enough to be worth a fight. Editorially, this would mean removing the second clause on the first bullet point here: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#triples-map This requires no change to the R2RML schema documentation or property table. (The syntactic sugar works by making the *same* single resource *both* a “triples map” *and* a “base table or view”, therefore the domains and ranges are unaffected.) It will require a review of all examples in the spec, and of the test cases. Richard > > -David > > [1] - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/75
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 17:54:42 UTC