public-prov-wg@w3.org from January 2013 by date

Thursday, 31 January 2013

• PROV-ISSUE-623: outdated definition of prov:wasDerivedFrom [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Timothy Lebo
• PROV-ISSUE-622 (json-ld-service-description): Should PRIV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-621 (json-ld-service-description): Should PRIV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-620 (json-ld-service-description): Should PRIV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-619 (json-ld-service-description): Should PRIV-AQ bless use of JSON-LD for service description? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Khalid Belhajjame
• scribe is required, thanks Luc Moreau
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Luc Moreau
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] Hua, Hook (388C)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

• meeting the exit criteria Paul Groth
• prov-constraints in sparql Paul Groth
• Re: Prov-XML test cases Stephan Zednik
• Re: Prov-XML test cases James Cheney
• Re: Prov-XML test cases Stephan Zednik
• Re: Prov-XML test cases Stephan Zednik
• Prov-XML test cases James Cheney
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-wg teleconference agenda Tom De Nies
• RE: prov-wg teleconference agenda Miles, Simon
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] Luc Moreau
• prov-wg teleconference agenda Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

• Re: PROV-O's cross reference index Graham Klyne
• Call for Participation: BigPROV @EDBT 2013: Workshop on Managing and Querying Provenance Data at Scale Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik
• Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-O's cross reference index Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-617: Why are some prov-constraint inferences in prov-o, but not others? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) James Cheney
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies

Monday, 28 January 2013

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-617: Why are some prov-constraint inferences in prov-o, but not others? [Ontology] Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-617: Why are some prov-constraint inferences in prov-o, but not others? [Ontology] Paul Groth
• Re: PROV comments from Clark&Parsia Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-617: Why are some prov-constraint inferences in prov-o, but not others? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-O's cross reference index Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-613 (prov-aq-draft-review): Review paq for release as last call working draft [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Friday, 25 January 2013

• prov-wg: Telcon Minutes Jan. 24 2013 Paul Groth

Thursday, 24 January 2013

• Constraints in Prolog James Cheney
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-617: Why are some prov-constraint inferences in prov-o, but not others? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-591: delegation PROV-O example missing activity reference [Primer] Stephan Zednik
• PROV-ISSUE-617: Why are some prov-constraint inferences in prov-o, but not others? [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: prov-wg - Telcon Agenda Jan. 24, 2013 Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Paolo Missier
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV comments from Clark&Parsia Luc Moreau
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] Khalid Belhajjame

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] Timothy Lebo
• Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
• Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
• Re: PROV-O's cross reference index Graham Klyne
• Re: prov-wg - Telcon Agenda Jan. 24, 2013 Graham Klyne
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] Daniel Garijo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] Satya Sahoo
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] Paul Groth
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] Miles, Simon
• PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Where to put public comment response Paul Groth
• Where to put public comment response Miles, Simon
• prov-wg - Telcon Agenda Jan. 24, 2013 Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) James Cheney

Sunday, 20 January 2013

• prov-wg 2013-01-17 teleconference minutes Luc Moreau
• PROV-O's cross reference index Timothy Lebo

Friday, 18 January 2013

• Fwd: Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Paul Groth

Thursday, 17 January 2013

• Re: Implementation reports Timothy Lebo
• Re: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Paolo Missier
• Re: Multiple XML schema files for a common target namespace (PROV-ISSUE-608) Stephan Zednik
• scribe required, please Luc Moreau
• RE: Responses to CR public comments Miles, Simon
• Re: Update on implementations of prov Pignotti, E.
• Re: Update on implementations of prov Eric Stephan
• Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Graham Klyne
• Update on implementations of prov Paul Groth
• RE: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Huynh T.D.
• Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-613 (prov-aq-draft-review): Review paq for release as last call working draft [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-613 (prov-aq-draft-review): Review paq for release as last call working draft [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Ivan Herman
• Re: PROV-WG teleconference agenda 2013.01.17 Graham Klyne
• Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Graham Klyne
• Re: problem viewing editor's draft (https in hg) Stian Soiland-Reyes
• Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Timothy Lebo

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

• Re: Implementation reports Timothy Lebo
• Re: Implementation reports Timothy Lebo
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-613 (prov-aq-draft-review): Review paq for release as last call working draft [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Miles, Simon
• Re: Implementation reports Tom De Nies
• problem viewing editor's draft (https in hg) Luc Moreau
• {Disarmed} Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Luc Moreau
• Re: Implementation reports Graham Klyne
• Re: question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering Luc Moreau
• PROV-ISSUE-615: Provide explanation to constraint 47(3) [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering Paul Groth
• Re: question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering Luc Moreau
• question on constraint 47 (3) - wasAssociatedWith-ordering Paul Groth
• Little PROV-O questions Miles, Simon
• PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614) Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV-WG teleconference agenda 2013.01.17 James Cheney

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

• PROV-WG teleconference agenda 2013.01.17 Luc Moreau
• examples with blank nodes in prov-o html document Luc Moreau
• Re: Implementation reports Paul Groth
• Implementation reports Graham Klyne
• Re: Responses to CR public comments Luc Moreau
• question about hadRole in example for qualifiedInfluence Luc Moreau
• Responses to CR public comments Paul Groth
• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik

Monday, 14 January 2013

• Re: ISSUE-595: Prov-xml subtyping needs to be marked in the document Stephan Zednik

Friday, 11 January 2013

• prov-wg: Minutes Jan. 10, 2012 Telcon Paul Groth
• Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Ivan Herman
• PROV-ISSUE-614: PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft [PROV-DICTIONARY] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 10 January 2013

• Re: prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Paul Groth
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Hua, Hook (388C)
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Stephan Zednik
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Stephan Zednik
• prov-aq review for release as working draft (ISSUE-613) Paul Groth
• PROV-ISSUE-613 (prov-aq-draft-review): Review paq for release as last call working draft [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Paolo Missier
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Paolo Missier
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Jun Zhao
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Khalid Belhajjame
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Daniel Garijo
• prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 10, 2012 Paul Groth

Wednesday, 9 January 2013

• Re: PROV-O modeling of Unix' PID? Timothy Lebo
• Typos in PROV-O examples Huynh T.D.
• Re: PROV Dictionary Tom De Nies
• Re: PROV Dictionary Tom De Nies
• Re: Fwd: prov-o rec confusion Paul Groth
• Re: Fwd: prov-o rec confusion Stian Soiland-Reyes

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

• Re: prov-o encoding of constraints ISSUE-612 Jun Zhao
• Re: prov-o encoding of constraints ISSUE-612 James Cheney
• Re: prov-o encoding of constraints ISSUE-612 Paul Groth
• Re: prov-o encoding of constraints ISSUE-612 Luc Moreau
• prov-o encoding of constraints ISSUE-612 Paul Groth
• PROV-ISSUE-612 (constraints-in-owl-public): Encoding of Constraints in OWL [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 7 January 2013

• PROV-O modeling of Unix' PID? Timothy Lebo

Sunday, 6 January 2013

• prov-wg Handling comments during CR Paul Groth
• PROV-ISSUE-611 (clarkparsia): Stardog implementation Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 4 January 2013

• Re: Updates to PROV-AQ Paul Groth
• Updates to PROV-AQ Graham Klyne
• Provenance Working Group Teleconference Minutes of 03 January 2013 Luc Moreau

Thursday, 3 January 2013

• Re: scribe for first 2013 teleconference Luc Moreau
• Re: scribe for first 2013 teleconference Daniel Garijo
• scribe for first 2013 teleconference Luc Moreau

Wednesday, 2 January 2013

• Re: PROV-AQ: How to indicate SPARQL endpoint for provenance (ISSUE 609) Paul Groth
• Re: PROV-AQ: How to indicate SPARQL endpoint for provenance (ISSUE 609) Graham Klyne
• Re: prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 3, 2012 Ivan Herman
• prov-wg Telcon Agenda January 3, 2012 Paul Groth

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2013 23:06:05 UTC