W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:50:14 -0500
Message-Id: <304B2CD4-AB82-43C2-8826-3517069DF63A@rpi.edu>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Following up from today's call, what is Stian's proposal?
I must admit that I have been following each of his feedback emails.

Thanks,
Tim

On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/618
> 
> Raised by: Graham Klyne
> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance
> 
> Some reviewers have commented that the provenance ping back description may be out-of-place in the PROV-AQ document.
> 
> This issue is a place-holder to bring this to a group vote, when the current PROV-AQ editing round is done.  (One reason for this delay os that Stian has proposed a small change to how pingback may work that could make it function more like an alternative discovery mechanism.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 18:50:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:28 UTC