- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:50:14 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Following up from today's call, what is Stian's proposal? I must admit that I have been following each of his feedback emails. Thanks, Tim On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-618 (pingback-in-prov-aq): Should pingback be described in PROV-AQ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/618 > > Raised by: Graham Klyne > On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance > > Some reviewers have commented that the provenance ping back description may be out-of-place in the PROV-AQ document. > > This issue is a place-holder to bring this to a group vote, when the current PROV-AQ editing round is done. (One reason for this delay os that Stian has proposed a small change to how pingback may work that could make it function more like an alternative discovery mechanism. > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 18:50:34 UTC