- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:09:20 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Tim,
I took a look at this, and I think it does indeed address the concern I raised
concerning finding entries in a dead-tree copy of the specification. Thank you
for this.
I have a suggestion (but I'm not putting it any more strongly than that) that
the grouped summaries of PROV-O terms (e.g. at the top of sections 4.1, 4.2,
etc.) might usefully include the term number, e.g. as:
(1) prov:Entity (2) prov:Activity (3) prov:Agent
#g
--
On 20/01/2013 16:40, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> prov-wg,
>
> In response to our discussions at the last F2F and ACTION-116, I have added http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#cross-reference-index to the latest draft of PROV-O.
>
> On the way towards implementing the index, I have also reordered the terms listed in http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#prov-o-at-a-glance
>
> The order of the terms is derived from https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/ontology/term-order.csv
>
> Any feedback on these changes is welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 19:15:01 UTC