- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:09:20 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Tim, I took a look at this, and I think it does indeed address the concern I raised concerning finding entries in a dead-tree copy of the specification. Thank you for this. I have a suggestion (but I'm not putting it any more strongly than that) that the grouped summaries of PROV-O terms (e.g. at the top of sections 4.1, 4.2, etc.) might usefully include the term number, e.g. as: (1) prov:Entity (2) prov:Activity (3) prov:Agent #g -- On 20/01/2013 16:40, Timothy Lebo wrote: > prov-wg, > > In response to our discussions at the last F2F and ACTION-116, I have added http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#cross-reference-index to the latest draft of PROV-O. > > On the way towards implementing the index, I have also reordered the terms listed in http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#prov-o-at-a-glance > > The order of the terms is derived from https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/ontology/term-order.csv > > Any feedback on these changes is welcome. > > Regards, > Tim >
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 19:15:01 UTC