W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:47:13 -0500
Cc: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, "Miles, Simon" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BE62CA6B-A357-4070-87AC-B249789605C8@rpi.edu>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
+1, particularly to the updated:

Another specialized kind of derivation is to say that one entity, commonly a part of a document, was a quote from another

-Tim


On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:

> +1
> 
> 2013/1/23 Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
> +1
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
> +1
> 
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 19:09, "Miles, Simon" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > Hello WG,
> >
> > Please find the proposed response to Chuck Morris here:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicCommentsCR#ISSUE-616
> >
> > thanks,
> > Simon
> >
> > Dr Simon Miles
> > Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics
> > Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
> > +44 (0)20 7848 1166
> >
> > Transparent Provenance Derivation for User Decisions:
> > http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1400/
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker [sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> > Sent: 23 January 2013 17:57
> > To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuoted>From in primer [Primer]
> 
> >
> > PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer]
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/616
> >
> > Raised by: Simon Miles
> > On product: Primer
> >
> > Public comment from Chuck Morris:
> >
> > "I just looked over the provenance primer.  One thing I noticed is that the wasQuotedFrom relationship is very confusing semantically.  Take the example in the primer where Betty posts a blog entry with a quote from the newspaper article.  The provenance is expressed as (ex:blogEntry prov:wasQuotedFrom ex:article .) But that seems to imply that the blog entry was quoted by the newspaper article instead of the other way around.  I suggest that a better name for the relationship would be prov:hadQuotationFrom."
> >
> > Original mail:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2013Jan/0006.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 


Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 20:57:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:28 UTC