- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:56:50 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Tracker, this is ISSUE-461 May we close this issue now? As a follow-on, Graham is asking for the entry numbers in the top level list, too. I have reservations about doing this but promised that I would explore it. I believe that this issue is closed, and this follow-on request is worthy of another issue that could use more support from others if it is an important editorial feature that the group thinks we need. Thanks, Tim On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > Tim, > > I took a look at this, and I think it does indeed address the concern I raised concerning finding entries in a dead-tree copy of the specification. Thank you for this. > > I have a suggestion (but I'm not putting it any more strongly than that) that the grouped summaries of PROV-O terms (e.g. at the top of sections 4.1, 4.2, etc.) might usefully include the term number, e.g. as: > > (1) prov:Entity (2) prov:Activity (3) prov:Agent > > #g > -- > > > > On 20/01/2013 16:40, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> prov-wg, >> >> In response to our discussions at the last F2F and ACTION-116, I have added http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#cross-reference-index to the latest draft of PROV-O. >> >> On the way towards implementing the index, I have also reordered the terms listed in http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#prov-o-at-a-glance >> >> The order of the terms is derived from https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/ontology/term-order.csv >> >> Any feedback on these changes is welcome. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> > >
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 14:58:10 UTC