- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:43:01 -0700
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I have updated the wiki page on XML Identifiers http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Prov-XML_Identifiers with additional advantages and disadvantages on using QName and anyURI I have also added my personal opinion on the options in the Analysis section. --Stephan On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:28 PM, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > At the last face-to-face meeting I agreed to check with Henry Thompson about this. I thought there was a tracked action about this but there doesn't seem to be. In any case, I asked Henry and he said he'd try to look at it this week. > > --James > > On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-553: QNames are too restrictive as identifiers [XML Serialization] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/553 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: XML Serialization >> >> >> The current schema uses xsd:QName for identifiers. >> >> As a result, the following identifier is not allowed: >> >> <prov:activity prov:id="pc1:00000p1"> >> <prov:label>align_warp 1</prov:label> >> </prov:activity> >> >> An xml schema validator would complain with: >> >> 'pc1:00000p1' is not a valid value for 'QName' >> >> >> Solution: allow for prov:QualifiedName (as defined in prov-n). >> >> Luc >> >> >> >> > > > -- > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > >
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 18:43:59 UTC