- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:01:38 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 14:02:10 UTC
Hi All, I've gone through the implementation surveys and seen where we were with respect to our CR exit criteria. - We have implementations reported from 8 different organizations. - When reading the implementation report it's important to recognize that southampton has reported 7 different implementations. - For PROV-O we have met the first part of the exit criteria that all constructs are supported by at least two independent implementations (ProvToolbox, PROVoKing) - For PROV-O we still need one pair of implementations to exchange provenance information for all constructs. - For PROV-N we only have two organizations that report supporting PROV-N (Southampton, and WebLab-PROV). However, weblab prov does not support many constructs and I'm not clear if WebLab does indeed support prov-n . - For PROV-Constraints, we only have one implementation reported that passes all tests. We'll discuss how to address the gaps today on the call. Thanks Paul
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 14:02:10 UTC