PROV-DICTIONARY internal review for first public working draft (ISSUE-614)

Hi everyone,

Our apologies that this mail did not go out sooner. We had some trouble
with our university mailing server, and couldn't send any mails anymore
from our approved email addresses.
I sent an email to the list from another address on Friday, but apparently
it didn't get through.

PROV-DICTIONARY is now ready for internal review.
This document is on the NOTE track, and we'd like to publish a working
draft by the time the RECs go to PR.

The latest editor's draft is here:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/prov-dictionary.html#dictionary-xml-schema

The following people volunteered for reviewing the document: Paolo, Stian,
James (maybe), Luc, and Paul, but others are also welcome to review of
course.
If you only have bandwidth to review part of the document (e.g. only the
ontology section), that could be useful as well.

Questions for reviewers
- Is the notation of Dictionary concepts clear & acceptable for you? (in
PROV-N, PROV-O and/or PROV-XML)
- Are the constraints acceptable, or are they too loose/too strict?
-- In particular, can the constraint "IF derivedByRemovalFrom(d2, d1,
{"k1"}) THEN hadDictionaryMember(d1, e1, "k1") " be dropped, or do you
strongly support it?
- Is the name PROV-DICTIONARY appropriate for the document?
- Can this be released as a first public working draft?
- If not, where are the blocking issues?
- If yes, are there other issues to work on?

In your review please include ISSUE-614

Due to the delay in sending this notification, I suggest we allow a little
more time to review the document.
We propose the due date for review to be on Wednesday the 23rd, so that we
can vote on the revised document on the 24th.

Thanks in advance to all the reviewers.

Regards,
Tom & Sam