- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:56:11 +0000
- To: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote: > Hello Stian, > > wow, and just when I thought I was done for the day... ;) Sorry!! > However, some of your blocking issues (8b, 39) are to include links to the > downloadable extension grammar and xml schema. Is this really necessary for > a first working draft of a document on Note track? Because these files still > need to be created, which will consume some time, and additional review. > This seems strange to me, especially since the previous (problematic) > iteration of Dictionary made it to WD5 of PROV-DM... No, considering it is only a first working draft I agree they should not all be blocking. However the reason I would be a bit stricter with this than with WD5 is that by now PROV-O and friends are very stable, and growing in popularity and usage ; and thus something like PROV Dictionary is more likely to be picked up at this point - therefore it's good to get some of the fundamentals right early, like namespaces. OK, I've gone through, and now I consider only these as blocking: 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 20, 34, 39, 41 They should generally be quick-fix or search/replace. For PROV-O and PROV-XML only download link would be needed - forget about the explanation for now. Download links is specially important for those two as that's how it can be used/tested. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 15:57:04 UTC