Re: Implementation reports

FWIW,

http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom 
is the only PROV-O term that dbpedia uses (and it uses it 11,547,302 times)

Some notes: https://github.com/timrdf/DataFAQs/wiki/Use-Case:-Does-DBpedia-use-PROV%3F

-Tim


On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be> wrote:

> 
> On a related note. Is anyone aware whether DBpedia will submit an implementation report?
> 
> I noticed you now have: dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama?oldid=495475434 for all records. I have no idea whether they plan to implement more or just this, and don't know anyone there.
> 
> - Tom
> 
> 2013/1/16 Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
> Paul,
> 
> No I don't.  I picked up on that while scanning the OA list.
> 
> #g
> --
> 
> 
> On 15/01/2013 18:01, Paul Groth wrote:
> Can you ask if you know them?
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>wrote:
> 
> Is anyone soliciting a report from LinkedTV?
> 
> "We already attach provenance information using PROV to the annotations we
> generate."
> --
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openannotation/2013Jan/0069.html
> 
> #g
> --
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>