Thursday, 30 October 2008
- Action 236: Review of n-ary datarange proposal
- comments in functional-style syntax
- mime request section for syntax document
- Review of the n-ary data range specification
Wednesday, 29 October 2008
Tuesday, 28 October 2008
- RE: OWL2 syntax doc check
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Fwd: OWL2 syntax doc check
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
Monday, 27 October 2008
- Public test case collection
- new annotation syntax in Manchester syntax
- mime request section for Manchester syntax document
Sunday, 26 October 2008
Saturday, 25 October 2008
Friday, 24 October 2008
- RE: ACTION-232 analysis of differences between functional syntax keywords and RDF syntax URIs
- agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)
- Re: comments on rdf:text solicited
- Re: comments on rdf:text solicited
- Fwd: comments on rdf:text solicited
- UCR document
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158]
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158]
- comments in Manchester syntax
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158]
- Re: Requirements feedback
- Re: document appendix for functional syntax MIME type
Thursday, 23 October 2008
- Re: are owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DeprecatedProperty deprecated?
- document appendix for functional syntax MIME type
- mime types for manchester and functional syntax
- ACTION-232 analysis of differences between functional syntax keywords and RDF syntax URIs
- Re: are owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DeprecatedProperty deprecated?
- Re: Quick Reference
- RDF features in OWL 2
Wednesday, 22 October 2008
- Re: are owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DeprecatedProperty deprecated?
- Re: are owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DeprecatedProperty deprecated?
- Re: update on ACTION-224 (Fill TBD implementation perspective in the Req before F2F)
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-154]
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158]
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-156]
- Re: are owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DeprecatedProperty deprecated?
Tuesday, 21 October 2008
Monday, 20 October 2008
- RE: Issue with unbounded alphabets in datatypes
- Re: Issue with unbounded alphabets in datatypes
- Re: Requirements feedback
- Re: Requirements feedback
- Re: ACTION-231 completed (add a proof sketch for Theorem 1 in the Profiles document)
- Requirements feedback
Sunday, 19 October 2008
- Re: ACTION-231 completed (add a proof sketch for Theorem 1 in the Profiles document)
- ACTION-231 completed (add a proof sketch for Theorem 1 in the Profiles document)
- ISSUE-149 (OWL 2 RL errors): Some problems with OWL 2 RL
- ISSUE-148 (datatype extensibility): owl:topDataProperty may invalidate Theorem 1 from Direct Semantics
- Capitalization changes for top/bottom properties
- I've just completed the ACTION-223 (fill in TBDs for keys and declarations in the Requirements document)
- ISSUE-147 (Data-propositional): Add UnionOf and IntersectionOf on Data Ranges
Friday, 17 October 2008
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-155]
- Re: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
Thursday, 16 October 2008
- Re: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
- RE: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
- Re: can we use lower case to start Top/Bottom role names?
- Re: can we use lower case to start Top/Bottom role names?
- RE: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
Wednesday, 15 October 2008
- Re: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
- Resolution of ISSUE-109 (XML Schema namespace)
- RE: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
- Quick Reference Card, final format
- ISSUE-146 (manchesterlabels): Specify use of labels in addition to/instead of entity URIs in serialization
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138)
- Re: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138)
- Meeting minutes (Oct 8, 2008) ready for review.
- Re: Proposal that we resolve ISSUE-109 by voting
Tuesday, 14 October 2008
- RE: can we use lower case to start Top/Bottom role names?
- Re: A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
- can we use lower case to start Top/Bottom role names?
- question on F2F agenda related to ISSUE-56
- Agenda TC 15/10/2008
- Proposal that we resolve ISSUE-109 by voting
Monday, 13 October 2008
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138)
- Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138)
- proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138)
Sunday, 12 October 2008
Saturday, 11 October 2008
Friday, 10 October 2008
- F2F and TPAC
- Re: publications done
- Re: publications done
- Re: publications done
- Re: publications done
- RE: publications done
- Re: publications done
- Re: publications done
Thursday, 9 October 2008
- RE: publications done
- publications done
- Re: responses to reviews of Manchester Syntax Document
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- Re: proposal to close ISSUE-56 - Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL?
- Re: proposal to close ISSUE-56 - Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL?
- RE: proposal to close ISSUE-56 - Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL?
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document
- proposal to close ISSUE-56 - Specify standard "repairs" for moving select RDF documents to OWL?
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
Wednesday, 8 October 2008
- Re: Response to Uli and Peter's review on the QRG
- Re: Response to Uli and Peter's review on the QRG
- Agenda for Fourth Face-to-Face (F2F) Meeting
- Re: Review of the structure of the requirements draft
- RE: new round of snapshots
- Re: Response to Uli and Peter's review on the QRG
- RE: new round of snapshots
- RE: Editors note in conformance
- Re: Response to Uli and Peter's review on the QRG
- Editors note in conformance
- responses to reviews of Manchester Syntax Document
- Re: Review of the structure of the requirements draft
- Response to Uli and Peter's review on the QRG
- RE: new round of snapshots
- Re: Review of the structure of the requirements draft
- RE: ACTION-210: Review on "Conformance" section
- Re: Review of the structure of the requirements draft
- new round of snapshots
- Re: Review of the structure of the requirements draft
- Re: ACTION-215 Review Manchester Syntax Document
- Re: ACTION-215 Review Manchester Syntax Document
- ISSUE-145 (mime): Which serializations should have mime types and file extensions (and what should they be)
- ACTION-216 Review manchester syntax doc by oct 8
- Re: new drafts
- Re: ACTION-215 Review Manchester Syntax Document
- RE: change to functional syntax document
- Re: change to functional syntax document
- change to functional syntax document
- Re: new drafts -- We are NOT ready to go and the documents are garbled!
- Re: new drafts
- A proposal for resolving the punning issue (ISSUE-114) + a related proposal for a tweak to the annotation system
- RE: new drafts -- We are NOT ready to go and the documents are garbled!
- RE: new drafts -- We are NOT ready to go and the documents are garbled!
- RE: abstract for Direct Semantics
- Review of the structure of the requirements draft
- Re: new drafts
- new drafts
- abstract for Direct Semantics
- Editors
Tuesday, 7 October 2008
- ACTION-215 Review Manchester Syntax Document
- Re: Action 211-- Review of Conformance Document
- Re: ACTION-210: Review on "Conformance" section
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- Agenda TC 08/10/2008
- Annotations and SKOS
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
Monday, 6 October 2008
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- RE: new preview snapshots
- RE: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- RE: new preview snapshots
- Re: new preview snapshots
- Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document
- RE: new preview snapshots
- new preview snapshots
Sunday, 5 October 2008
Saturday, 4 October 2008
- RE: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- RE: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
Friday, 3 October 2008
- Axiom placeholders/ Blank axioms?
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- RE: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- Re: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- RE: Proposed tweaks to Annotations
- OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document
- Proposed tweaks to Annotations
Thursday, 2 October 2008
- Review of OWL 2 Reference Card
- Re: SKOS in OWL 2
- Re: SKOS in OWL 2
- RE: Difference between owl:onDataRange and owl:onDataType
- RE: Difference between owl:onDataRange and owl:onDataType
Wednesday, 1 October 2008
- SKOS in OWL 2
- Review of OWL 2 Reference Card (second version of 1 October 2008)
- Re: Quick reference guide status update
- Difference between owl:onDataRange and owl:onDataType
- draft of OWL WG comments on SKOS Reference
- Re: Quick reference guide status update
- Re: Quick reference guide status update
- Conformance and Test Cases in Wiki "drafts" list
- Re: personal review of SKOS Reference for WG consideration