W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Proposal that we resolve ISSUE-109 by voting

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:30:50 -0700
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <27106.1224045050@ubuhebe>

> There has been extensive discussion around this issue, several  
> proposals and at least one vote: see, e.g., [1], [2], [3] and [4].
> I don't believe that there is anything new to add, or that it is an  
> issue that can be resolved by (gradually) identifying the "right  
> answer". I therefore propose that we resolve the issue by taking a  
> *final* vote.

Makes sense.  I feel pretty strongly we should go with the
two-namespaces approach, but I'll agree to go along with the majority on
this if everyone else will.  (Please consider this a proxy to that
effect, if I'm unable to make the call.  I'm traveling this week.)

       -- Sandro

> Regards,
> Ian
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/0187.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jun/0031.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Aug/0285.html
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/meeting/2008-06-18#ISSUE__2d_109
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 04:31:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC