Re: SKOS in OWL 2 from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2008-10-02 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from October 2008)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:46:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: sattler@cs.man.ac.uk
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org, sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
Message-Id: <20081002.074612.182515527.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: SKOS in OWL 2
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:45:32 +0100

> wow, this was really helpful for me - it clarifies some questions i
> had related to SKOS.  Am I right in assuming that, if S11 was resolved
> in some way to be in OWL 2 DL (e.g., by replacing rdfs:label with an
> object property owl:label as suggested before), then S56-S58 would
> also automatically fall into OWL 2 DL? 

I don't think so.  These are chains that end with dataproperties.

peter

Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 11:47:23 UTC