W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: agenda item for Teleconference 5 November on MIME types (ISSUE-145)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:16:07 +0100
Message-ID: <4906E667.7080105@w3.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org


Bijan Parsia wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:
> 
>> On 28 okt 2008, at 09:06, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>> What about '.owlx'?
>>>
>>> maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf' and
>>> 'owlm' for the other two.
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>
>> Although certainly prettier,
> 
> By leaps and bounds.
> 
>> I think it would create problems on FAT-based file systems that
>> (still) use the 8.3 naming scheme as these may truncate a long
>> extension to three characters.
> 
> But they would truncate to .owl, right? That seems harmless to me.
> 

But then, say, specialized editors running on my windows machine would
be screwed up:-(

I.

> Cheers,
> Bijan.

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 10:18:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC