Bijan Parsia wrote: > On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > >> On 28 okt 2008, at 09:06, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> What about '.owlx'? >>> >>> maybe as a matter of consistency we can also consider using 'owlf' and >>> 'owlm' for the other two. >>> >>> Ivan >> >> Although certainly prettier, > > By leaps and bounds. > >> I think it would create problems on FAT-based file systems that >> (still) use the 8.3 naming scheme as these may truncate a long >> extension to three characters. > > But they would truncate to .owl, right? That seems harmless to me. > But then, say, specialized editors running on my windows machine would be screwed up:-( I. > Cheers, > Bijan. -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 10:18:31 UTC