- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:57:52 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
The resolution of ISSUE-145 calls for MIME types for Functional Syntax, Manchester Syntax, and XML Serialization. To polish this off, we need the actual mime types. It is also a good idea to specify a preferred extension and some MAC stuff. I think that we need to make a "decision" on these. I suggest that if no consensus emerges before 5 November that we should discuss this on 5 November. The current suggestions (mine modified by Ivan): MIME Type Extension MAC file type Functional text/owl-functional .ofn TEXT Manchester text/owl-manchester .omn TEXT XML application/owl+xml ???? ??? Do we actually need to have a MAC file type? peter
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 15:58:40 UTC